Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.
Date: April 30, 2024 Tue
Time: 12:32 am
Time: 12:32 am
Results for judicial elections
1 results foundAuthor: Dippel, Christian Title: How Common are Electoral Cycles in Criminal Sentencing? Summary: Existing empirical evidence suggests a pervasive pattern of electoral cycles in criminal sentencing in the U.S.: judges appear to pass more punitive sentences when they are up for re-election, consistent with models of signaling where voters have more punitive preferences than judges. However, this pervasive evidence comes from only three states. Combining the existing evidence with data we collected from eight additional states, we are able to reproduce previous results, but find electoral cycles in only one of the eight additional states. Sentencing cycles appear to be the exception rather than the norm. We find that their existence hinges on the level of competition in judicial elections, which varies considerably across states. Details: Cambridge, MA: national Bureau of Economic Research, 2019. 29p. Source: Internet Resource: NBER Working Paper No. 25716: Accessed April 12, 2019 at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w25716 Year: 2019 Country: United States URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w25716.pdf Shelf Number: 155381 Keywords: Electoral Cycles Judges Judicial ElectionsPolitics Sentencing |